Wisconsin Procedures for Soil Testing, Plant Analysis and Feed & Forage Analysis

Editor: John Peters
Soil Science Department
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
University of Wisconsin-Extension-Madison
http://uwlab.soils.wisc.edu/lab-procedures/Last revised: October 2013* This on-line document replaces the publication “Wisconsin Procedures for Soil Testing, Plant Analysis and Feed & Forage Analysis”, No. 6, Soil Fertility Series; last revised 1987 by E.E. Schulte, J.B. Peters and P.R. Hodgson.
The work of these individuals as well as many other current and former laboratory staff members is gratefully acknowledged.** This page requires a Javascript enabled web browser.

Introduction

The procedures outlined herein are employed in the University of Wisconsin Soil and Forage Analysis Laboratory, Marshfield, and the Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory, Madison. Several private soil testing laboratories also follow these procedures, including all Wisconsin DATCP Certified Soil Testing Laboratories.

A laboratory test is only as good as the research upon which it is based. These procedures have been modified from the research efforts of a great many individuals, at the University of Wisconsin and elsewhere, and adapted for routine analysis. This is a continuing process. As new information is uncovered through research, soil, plant, and forage tests must be updated to include the latest findings. Consequently, the procedures found herein are revised from time-to-time as needed to keep them current.

Development of Soil Testing Procedures

Soil test correlation: The first step in developing a soil test is to find a suitable extracting solution. This is the objective of a correlation study. A large number of the more important agricultural soils are collected. These soils are then cropped in the greenhouse, where most of the variables can be controlled. After a specified period, the assay crop is harvested; the amount of the element to be tested that is taken up by the crop is measured.

From knowledge of the chemistry of the element in the soil, several different possible extracting solutions are used to extract the element from the soil. An ideal extractant would remove the same amount of the element as is taken up by the plant. This is rarely achieved in practice, but a close correlation between plant uptake and the amount of the element extracted chemically is sought. In some cases, a regression equation that considers other soil properties may improve the prediction of plant availability of the element in question. Once a suitable extractant has been found, the effects of shaking time, solution-to-soil ratio, reagent concentration, etc. must be studied before the test can be run on a routine basis.

Soil test calibration: After a soil test procedure has been developed through greenhouse and laboratory experimentation, it is necessary to calibrate the test on a large number of sites under field conditions. The objective of soil calibration is to determine the amount of nutrient that must be added to the soil at different soil test levels of that nutrient to obtain maximum yield.

Because variables such as climate, insects, disease, drainage, etc. cannot be controlled as closely in the field as in the greenhouse, it is necessary to repeat field calibration studies three to five years before definite conclusions can be drawn.
Sampling
Correct usage of soil, plant, and forage results depends on 1) a sample representative of the area or batch from which it was taken, 2) an accurate laboratory analysis, and 3) the correct interpretation of lab results. The laboratory analysis should be the most accurate step unless gross analytical errors go undetected or poor laboratory technique is allowed. Built –in checks can minimize these possibilities. The interpretation of the lab results depends on knowledge of the relationship between the test value and plant, soil, and animal response.

The greatest source of error is usually the sample itself. Since physical samples may be extremely heterogeneous, it is important that the sample tested be truly representative. Procedures for taking representative samples may be found in the following articles:

Lime and Fertilizer Recommendations

The interpretation of soil test results and the procedure for making lime and fertilizer recommendations are covered in detail in ‘Nutrient Application Rate Guidelines for Field, Vegetable, and Fruit Crops in Wisconsin’ (A2809).
  1. Sample Preparation
  2. Internal Check System
  3. Standard Soils Protocol
  4. pH & Sikora Lime Requirement
  5. Available P
  6. Available K (this is the official WI method for soil K)
  7. Organic Matter (Weight loss-on-ignition)
  8. Available Zinc
  9. Available Boron
  10. Available Manganese
  11. Exchangeable Cations (Ca++, Mg++, K+, Na+)
  12. Calculated Cation Exchange Capacity
  13. Sulfate-Sulfur
  14. Soluble Salts (Electrical Conductivity)
  15. Particle Size Analysis (Physical Analysis)
  16. Inorganic Nitrogen
    1. Nitrate-N (Colorimetric Method)
    2. Nitrate and Nitrite by Flow Injection Analysis
    3. Ammonium-N by Flow Injection Analysis (see above)
  17. Total Nitrogen
  18. Organic Carbon
  19. Total Elemental Analysis with ICP-OES and ICP-MS
  20. Heavy Metals
  21. Chloride
  22. Lead
  23. Ash
  24. Phosphorus for Forest Soil
  25. Mound Sand
Plant Analysis
  1. Total Elemental Analysis with ICP-OES
    1. Alternate Digestion Using Dry Ash Method
  2. Total Nitrogen by Flow Injection Analysis
  3. Nitrogen – Inorganic Forms (Includes Ammonium, Nitrate, Nitrite)
  4. Chloride
  5. Organic Carbon
  6. Heavy Metals
  7. Potato Petiole Nitrate
  8. Ash
Feed and Forage Analysis
  1. Wet Chemical Analysis
    1. Sample Preparation & Lab Dry Matter
    2. Total Dry Matter
    3. Crude Protein (CP)
    4. NDF (Neutral Detergent Fiber)
    5. ADF (Acid Detergent Fiber)
    6. Lignin
    7. ADFCP
    8. NDFCP
    9. Ash
    10. Fat
    11. In Vitro Digestibility
    12. Total Starch
    13. Starch Digestibility; Degree of Starch Access
    14. Major Mineral Analysis (P, K, Ca, Mg)
    15. Sulfur Determination in Manure and Forage
    16. Total Elemental Analysis with ICP-OES
    17. Nitrate Nitrogen
    18. Heavy Metals
    19. Selenium
    20. Chloride
    21. Ash
  2. NIR Analysis
    1. Sample Collection
    2. Subsampling
    3. Drying
    4. Grinding
    5. Mixing Dried and Ground Sample
    6. Packing and Scanning
    7. Equation Use
      1. References for Calibrations Used
        1. Alfalfa Hay: NIRS Forage and Feed Testing Consortium, June 2007 alfalfa hay calibration, file name: ah50-3. Parameters used: DM, CP, ADF, NDF, dNDF48, Ca, P, K, Mg, ash, lignin, fat, RUP.
        2. Grass Hay: NIRS Forage and Feed Testing Consortium, June 2007 grass hay calibration, file name: gh50-2. Parameters used: DM, CP, ADF, dNDF48, NDF, Ca, P, K, Mg, Ash.
        3. Mixed Hay: NIRS Forage and Feed Testing Consortium, June 2007 mixed hay calibration, file name: mh50-3. Parameters used: DM, CP, ADF, dNDF48, NDF, Ca, P, K, Mg, ash, fat, lignin, RUP.
          iv. Mixed Haylage: NIRS Forage and Feed Testing Consortium, June 2007 mixed haylage calibration, file name: hg50-3. Parameters used: DM, CP, ADF, dNDF48, NDF, Ca, P, K, Mg, ash, fat, lignin, ADP, RUP.
        4. Fermented Corn Silage: NIRS Forage and Feed Testing Consortium, June 2007 fermented corn silage calibration, file name: cs50-2. Parameters used: DM, CP, ADF, dNDF48, IVTDMD, NDF, Ca, P, K, Mg, ash, fat, lignin.
    8. Sample Storage
Manure Analysis
  1. Manure
    1. Sample Preparation & Lab Dry Matter
    2. All Other Methods
  2. Sediment Analysis
    1. Carbon
      1. Total Carbon
      2. Organic Carbon
    2. Total Elemental Analysis with ICP-OES

Greenhouse & Lime

  1. Greenhouse Media
  2. Lime